Chernobyl-Episode-5] chernobyl hbo 5 episode.
For us, this is a story about truth.
The last thing we wanted to do was fall into the same trap that liars fall into.
You feel that desire for authenticity throughout.
|Twenty-six years ago today, reactor number 4 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukrainian Republic of the Soviet Union experienced a catastrophic explosion.
The resulting catastrophe proved to be the worst nuclear disaster in history.
It spread radioactive contamination across much of Europe and western Russia and resulted in the resettlement of thousands of people away from the contaminated areas.
The safety of nuclear power was called into question as a result of the accident and development of new nuclear power plants slowed considerably as a result.
Tony and friend Zamir Gotta team up for a trip to the former Soviet Republic, the Ukraine.
They tour Chernobyl and the radiated ghost town of Pripayat, explore a once top-secret port for Soviet submarines, drink vodka and enjoy green borscht.
Visiting Chernobyl was a very sad and scary experience.
I think I can speak for the whole crew when I say that if we were just visiting Ukraine on vacation, we would not have gone there.
For the sake of the show, we decided to check out the power plant and the town down the road, Prypiat.
Our guide, Sergey, gave us a long list of do’s and don’ts while filming in the Prypiat area.
Most of them were don’ts.
Don’t touch anything.
Don’t wander off any paved roads.
Don’t let any leaves or branches touch you.
Don’t walk on or kick any moss that’s on the ground.
Don’t eat or drink outside our vehicles.
Bottom line: watch what you’re doing.
Not ten minutes after Sergey repeated these instructions, he led us down a dirt path surrounded by bushes and trees with low hanging branches.
We tried our best not to touch the branches, but we all ended up touching leaves and shrubs, and a few of us even got smacked with branches.
Our guide told us to be sure to wash our clothes a few times before wearing them again.
But for peace of mind, once we returned to our hotel, I, like everyone else on the crew, threw away the clothes I was wearing, as well as my shoes.
Recalling the tragedy that was Chernobyl is spooky enough, but actually visiting ground zero and the surrounding areas of the nuclear disaster will leave a lasting impression on anyone who visits.
And apparently, a lot of people visit.
When we were leaving Prypiat, we noticed more vans coming into the secured area.
Those vans turned out to be tour vans, filled with tourists mostly from Russia and Eastern Europe taking pictures of everything around them.
I knew they weren’t journalists because most were dressed in Euro-trash-themed clothing and nearly all had disposable and pocket-sized digital cameras.
After packing up our equipment, we drove beyond the 30-kilometer security perimeter, back to habitable grounds.
We pulled over at the first convenience shop we saw to get water and snacks for everyone.
It was a dim lit, mostly empty space, with a few bare shelves, but they did have water.
However, instead of necessities that you would normally find in your neighborhood store, this place predominately had merchandise.
T-shirts, coffee mugs, calendars, the list goes on.
All of which read “CHERNOBYL 4-26-86” with the universal sign for radioactivity replacing the “O” in Chernobyl.
It almost felt like a scene out of Spaceballs.
“Chernobyl the lunchbox, Chernobyl the breakfast cereal, Chernobyl the Flame Thrower- the kids love this one.
” So I did what any late-twenties American would do.
I bought as much stuff as I could carry.
Thirty three years ago, after an explosion at a nearby power plant, the city of Pripyat in (what is now) Ukraine was evacuated.
As part of the preparation for the new HBO series “Chernobyl,” writer Craig Mazin visited the abandoned city, just one step in the process of trying to ensure that the five-episode show captured the full scope of the now-infamous disaster.
You get a real sense of it,” Mazin told IndieWire.
“The story we’re telling is a Soviet story.
It’s a story of the Soviet system, which was terrible.
And it is a story of the Soviet citizenry who were the subject of awful visitations by Czars and revolutions and Nazis and Stalin and forced famine, and then Chernobyl.
So I wanted to honor that by telling it from the point of view of them.
Even when tasked with conveying some of the more explicit, tragic aftermath of the reactor malfunction, “Chernobyl” finds insight via the most seemingly mundane of details.
“That required kind of both living inside that mind in that culture and sharing the scripts early on with people who grew up in Soviet Ukraine and having them vet through things,” Mazin said.
“Insane attention to tiny details, clothing, watches, glasses, everything.
Shooting in Lithuania, a lot of our crew were old enough to remember what it was like living in the Soviet Union.
They would let us know, ‘You know, if you brought your lunch to work, you would use a briefcase for that.
What may stand out to viewers is that no one in the series speaks with a recognizably Russian accent.
As Jared Harris, Stellan Skarsgard, Emily Watson, and others navigate their respective characters’ place in this unfolding saga, they do so without too much vocal affect.
For Johan Renck, who directed all five installments, that decision only emphasized the other elements of their performances that were true to the Soviet experience.
“It’s the culture that you need to embrace and it’s really hard to embrace culture without the use of language,” Renck said.
“But then, it was trying to find some kind of Soviet behaviorisms, whatever you can do to try to sort of promote a cultural expression and body language and facial expressions.
To be honest, one of the tricky parts is that was we were using mostly British actors.
|Do you know what actually happened at Chernobyl? HBO and Sky Atlantic’s new drama recounts the disaster under a horrifying, gripping lens, in one of the best new shows of the year.
While the April 1986 Chernobyl accident is one of the most noted nuclear disasters in history, the name has become synonymous with dark tourism and cheap horror movies for recent generations.
This new drama, created and written by Craig Mazin (Identity Thief, The Hangover Part II), spotlights the real horror in the disaster; a power struggle between politicians and scientific experts with thousands of lives hanging in the balance.
The first episode kicks off after the fallout of the disaster, as a troubled physicist Valery Legasov (Jared Harris) kills himself in his apartment.
We’re then taken back 24 months prior preceding the catastrophe in 1986, as civilians in Chernobyl, Ukraine are suddenly alerted to a concerning boom from the nearby power plant, with smoke bellowing into the sky.
The show tackles perspectives on the disaster from multiple levels.
The workers inside the power plant are at the mercy of their boss who is in denial about the explosion’s extent, sending them to the reactor’s core, and their death, despite numerous reports contradicting him.
His adamant stance that the situation can be contained is to protect himself from Soviet Union officials, who want to uphold an image of communist idealism on the world stage.
There’s a borderline comedic edge to the extent of their denial, which treads a delicate line in amplifying your disbelief, and horror, over dismissal of the facts.
One scene sees Soviet officials celebrate leader Mikhail Gorbachev after being told the situation is under control, which strikes the right balance between highlighting their shocking naivety without coming off like a mocking cartoon.
It does this by keeping the people affected in constant focus.
As the firefighters outside assist at the power plant, with radiated reactor debris everywhere, the show becomes an agonising crash in slow motion.
They’re treating the job like any other emergency, unknowingly handling radioactive materials while weighing up how to tackle the blaze.
It’s painful to watch, with the consequences of this misinformation ricochet gradually showing itself in gruesome, harrowing detail.
Despite the horror on-screen, it’s hard to pull your eyes away because it’s so beautifully shot.
Johan Renck, whose previous credits include music videos for Madonna, Kylie Minogue, and episodes of Breaking Bad, treats the power plant like a dominating omen over the city.
A later shot sees citizens stand in awe of the spectacle on a bridge as radioactive debris floats onto their skin through the air.
It’s mesmerising, infuriating and terrifying; the sweet spot where Chernobyl’s multi-level nightmare wallops you at once.
Some might find Chernobyl too bleak to enjoy, but very few shows land with such a startling and unsettling first impression.
As entertainment, a retelling of the disaster, and a warning of scarily relevant dangers, Chernobyl is a staggering, unmissable achievement which will haunt you for weeks.
Filming was also done around Ukraine and even at the decommissioned Chernobyl nuclear power station itself.
Russian authorities have offered no comment on the program, but Mr.
Slivyak, for one, says it will not be liked by an establishment that remains heavily invested in nuclear energy and that still operates several Chernobyl-type reactors.
What happened 33 years ago had monumental consequences for the Soviet Union, according to Vitaly Tolstikov, a historian of nuclear power at Chelyabinsk State Institute of Culture in the Russian Urals.
“As a result of the disaster, people started to doubt the ability of the state to manage things.
They lost faith, and this may be considered one of the causes of the Soviet Union’s collapse,” he says.
Some consequences of the accident are still being counted today, Mr.
Tolstikov notes: “The long-term health costs are still not calculated.
Whole districts of Ukraine and Belarus ceased to be economically active.
” Belarus, another post-Soviet state, is where most of Chernobyl’s radiation came down.
It is because of the ongoing effects that some people want nothing to do with the new dramatization.
“We know about this film, but nobody wants to talk about it,” she says.
“People who were there don’t want to relive it.
Every day I work with the survivors, and often see them off on the last journey.
A public opinion survey done by the state-funded VTsIOM agency in 2016 found that attitudes toward the nuclear power industry have changed dramatically since the years following the Chernobyl accident.
In 1990, polls showed that 56% of Russians were opposed to further development of nuclear power, while just 14% supported it.
A quarter century later, 58% approved of atomic energy, while 28% had a negative opinion.
“There was a generation of Soviet people who witnessed Chernobyl, survived its consequences, and felt its lessons,” says Mikhail Chernysh, deputy director of scientific studies at the official Institute of Sociology in Moscow.
He adds, “A lot of kids today probably know about it only because there is a popular video game called Chernobyl, where you go to a virtual Chernobyl and battle virtual monsters.
Who knows what the next generation will know or think about it? Mr.
Slivyak, the Russian anti-nuclear activist, concurs.
“People think that Chernobyl happened in a different country, long ago,” he says.
Slivyak’s family comes from southern Belarus, which is still under Chernobyl’s shadow.
He says he well remembers the public mood of anxiety and fear during those tense days when there was no official information about the accident, even as mass evacuations were underway in the communities near the stricken reactor.
“The first announcement was made on TV several days later, and it gave no real details.
I recall it just spoke about a minor accident, nothing to worry about,” he says.
The activist is among those who, contrary to others, have complimented “Chernobyl” for what they see as the use of sharp, horrifying detail to depict the accident.
The miniseries is “close to real events as far as that is possible,” Mr.